Home » Obama, War & Human Rights

The New War on Terror?

Guantanamo Bay in Cuba

Guantanamo Bay in Cuba

The Obama administration has made it a point to reverse most everything the Bush administration established in the War on Terror, most importantly its policies on the treatment of “unlawful enemy combatants” as defined in 2001 after the September 11 terrorist attacks. On his second full day in office, Obama signed an executive order to close Guantanamo Bay, a controversial detention center that is known for its harsh interrogation techniques and denial of habeus corpus rights (the fundamental right to a fair and just trial).

On January 11, 2002, the first 800 men were brought to Guantanamo Bay, mostly citizens of Pakistan and Afghanistan who were turned into the authorities for bounty. Only 5 percent of these men were captured on the battlefield, 8 percent identified as Al Qaeda, and 45 percent have ever engaged in a hostile act. One man was recently convicted because he was a hired cook for the Taliban.

In addition to closing Guantanamo Bay, the Obama administration signed an executive order to shut down all black sites world-wide. Black sites are secret interrogation sites set up by the C.I.A. and located in countries that will allow for quick relocation if their identities are revealed. The most important one is located in Poland, and there are others in places like Thailand and Bosnia. These sites were crucial in carrying out torture techniques as they are outside U.S. territory and thus legal jurisdiction.

In mid April of this year, the Obama administration made a controversial decision and under a Freedom of Information lawsuit filed by the ACLU, released Bush administration memos and documents that cite in detail all interrogation methods used by the C.I.A. including waterboarding, sleep deprivation, and a previously unknown tactic: to exploit one prisoners’ phobias, they planned to lock him in a box with insects. One Justice Department document disclosed that C.I.A. interrogators used waterboarding techniques 266 times on two Al Qaeda prisoners, and at least 83 times on one prisoner in a month.

After the release of these documents, many Democrats have called for further investigation and possible prosecution of the officials who called for and authorized the torture techniques. Obama, on the other hand, believes these officials cannot be prosecuted because they were told the techniques were legal before authorizing them.

Up until now, the brunt of the blame has been on the Republican Party and its knowledge and promotion of these controversial techniques. Obama labeled these times as “dark chapter in our nation’s history.” However, new information released today details that top Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Bob Graham and Sen. John Rockefeller, were briefed on these tactics as well. Pelosi concedes that she was briefed, but only once in September of 2002. This is out of the 40 or more C.I.A. congressional briefings.

As the U.S. government continues to shift its policies in the War on Terror, human rights groups rejoice at what they deem just and necessary steps to reversing Bush administration policies. Many people see honesty and transparency as the best ways to proceed in the War on Terror. However, others worry about safety of the United States and its people as we contemplate moving Guantanamo Bay prisoners onto U.S. soil. What will the repercussions be of releasing memos outlining torture strategies? Many argue we are creating more enemies in the Middle East by broadcasting what we have done to their citizens. And, if the most powerful country in the world uses torture techniques, are we giving other countries grounds to justify torturing their own prisoners and possibly U.S. citizens? In the upcoming months, the Obama administration and congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, will need to look closely at their decisions, as the future of U.S. relations internationally rides on how we handle the War on Terror.

More Info

NYTimes: List Says Top Democrats Were Briefed on Interrogations

Fox News: The GOP Guantanamo Offensive

Alexandra Pope is a senior at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, majoring in political science and journalism.  She currently holds a job at an immigration law firm and is an Associate Producer on the “Youthanized” documentary.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Chris
    Although I don't agree with every technique that the US has used to interrogate prisoners of war. I do agree that on certain occasions that these techniques have saved lives, not only US but the lives of people all over the world. One thing we never see is what information was gathered by using these interrogation techniques as most of it is classified as Top Secret. And to be honest, I'd rather be water boarded than the alternative Middle East torture technique of beheadings and having parts of my body chopped off. We do need to look at what we're doing to these prisoners, but condemning all of these techniques is ridiculous and dangerous. Much love for Project Youthanize. Always good to keep the youth on their toes, and just giving an alternative look at the topic.
  • GCP
    Couldn't disagree more. Chaney calls for the declassification and release of information garnered from torture sessions that he insists saved lives and averted various attacks against the US and US interests. I'd like to see the administration take him up on that, as I believe we'd discover that while we may have learned a lot from the interrogations of prisoners, very little useful information was discovered as a result of the application of torture during these sessions. As an example, Abu Zabadah, who the article referenced as having been waterboarded at least 83 times, is cited by CIA interrogators on the scene as having given up all the useful information they got from him before the second waterboarding session. Seems like that the other 81 sessions of torture were punative, doesn't it?
    But really, what we learned or didn't learn from the application of torture techniques is technically irrelevant, because the bottom line is that in torturing prisoners of war, the previous administration broke domestic and international law. Period.
  • JB
    These are some of the most difficult and divisive decisions we as a nation face. Difficult because they involve the classic moral dilemma of the ends justifying the means. In the excellent summary above, the writer hones in on the essence of the issues, and correctly points out that our nation will be defined by the decisions we make in the next year, just as we were defined by the decisions we made in the last eight. Project YOUthanize: fantastic forum for young and obviously talented thinkers/writers! Thank you for your activism!
blog comments powered by Disqus